Chinese Children from Hunan Province Sold for International Adoption to US, Poland, the Netherlands UPDATED

By on 5-10-2011 in China, International Adoption, Trafficking, US

Chinese Children from Hunan Province Sold for International Adoption to US, Poland, the Netherlands UPDATED

In February we reported on child trafficking in China and efforts to reunite families. Two new articles now link the trafficking in Hunan Province by family planning officials and international adoption to the US, Poland and the Netherlands.

Global Times states “Over the last 10 years, family-planning “enforcers” in Shaoyang have seized at least 20 children from Longhui county, who were born outside their parents’ birth quota, and dispatched them to a local children welfare center, according to media reports.

The welfare center then named all the seized children “Shao” and listed them as orphans available for $3,000 adoption. Some now live in the US, the Netherlands and Poland and have never met with their Chinese parents since adoption, the Xinhua News Agency reported, citing a report by Caixin Century Magazine.

Village officials usually accompanied the enforcers when taking a child, according to the report.

Their explanation for the action was that either the child had been illegally adopted or the parents had breached the national one-child policy and could not afford a fine.

Some victims were actually a family’s first child, the report said.

“They mistook my daughter for being illegal when my wife and I were working in Shenzhen,” Yang Libing, a local migrant worker, told the magazine, adding that their 7-year-old child has been found living in the US.

The child-snatching phenomenon climaxed in about 2005, the Beijing-based magazine reported, and some welfare centers even worked with human traffickers to obtain children and reclassify them as orphans for “export.”

The magazine said that for every child sent to a welfare center, the family-planning office could receive 1,000 yuan ($154) or more from the welfare center.

“Before 1997, they usually punished us by tearing down our houses for breaching the one-child policy,” Yuan Chaoren, a villager, told the magazine.

“But after 2000, they began to confiscate our children.”

Longhui is a national poverty-level county with a population of more than 1 million.

Six years ago, the fine for breaching the policy was about 8,000 yuan, preventing many poor parents from saving their children, the report said.

Late on Monday, Shaoyang government announced a joint investigation into the reported scandal alongside officials from the disgraced county of Longhui, without offering details.

An anonymous employee with the Longhui family planning office denied the alleged child trafficking, saying the office had improved from a year ago when accusations of “inappropriate work” had first broken.

“When we found illegal birth children, we fined the parents in accordance with the law,” he told the Global Times, refusing to elaborate.

If the scandal is confirmed, the family-planning office and the welfare center have committed serious crimes against humanity, said Feng Yujun, a law professor with the Renmin University of China in Beijing.

“To bring their children back, parents can either impeach the family planning office up to its supervisor or demand state compensation or apply for administrative review at the local court,” he told the Global Times.

Filing a lawsuit was also an option, he said, but would be much more time consuming and costly.

Some analysts questioned the apparent lax government supervision over an alleged decade-long series of crimes.

Lu Jiehua, a sociologist with Peking University, told the Global Times that the difficulties of enforcing the one-child policy might have forced the officials to resort to extreme measures.

“They are under extreme pressure as all their job evaluations are related to the effectiveness of reducing the number of children,” Lu said. “Their job is difficult, but that is no excuse for trafficking children, which is absolutely illegal.”

Other analysts called for more adoption regulations to prevent a profit chain in which family-planning offices snatched babies and welfare centers repackaged them into “products” for export.

Longhui is by no means the first county to snatch babies.

In 2005, a number of children welfare centers in Hengyang, also in Hunan, were exposed for participation in human trafficking.

Some of the welfare centers even required employees to look for children that could be seized, the Caixin Century Magazine said, citing local news reports.

Two years ago, the Southern Metropolis Daily reported similar cases in Zhenyuan county, Guizhou Province, where local welfare centers bought children for 3,000 yuan and sold them to adoptive foreigners for $3,000 each.

As the population increases in China, family planning policy faces increasing challenges.

More than 13 million people in the country have no hukou, or household registration, and most had been born in violation of the national family planning policy, according to Ma Jiantang, head of the National Bureau of Statistics. ”

The Telegraph reports “The case generated more than 33,500 comments on China’s leading 163.com web portal, trending as the number one ‘hot topic’ before the discussion on the story was apparently taken off-line by web censors.

“They sold the factories, then they sold the land, and now they turn to selling people,” said one bitter posting, while another added, “These officials are even worse than human traffickers, because they sold babies under the legal cover of being public servants.” The lengthy report contained emotive videos, old photographs and recorded interviews with families from the impoverished county of Longhui who had been forced to give up their children after being too poor to pay the 8,000 yuan (£780) fine.”””Before 1997, they usually punished us by tearing down our houses for breaching the one-child policy,” Yuan Chaoren, a villager, told the magazine, “But after 2000, they began to confiscate our children.” Another parent, Yang Libing alleged that his six-month-old daughter had been removed by officials in January 2005 even though she was his only child “They mistook my daughter for being illegal when my wife and I were working in Shenzhen,” said Mr Yang, a migrant worker who like many poor Chinese had left his child in the care of relatives while he went to earn money.

“There were furious, the grandmother took her granddaughter to the pigsty to hide,” said Mr Yang’s father, recalling the day the child was seized, adding that the angry cadre still confiscated the “illegal” child for refusing to pay “social alimony”.

The family tried to ‘buy back’ the child for 6,000 yuan (£580) the next day had already been sent to the local welfare house where officials had received 1,000 yuan (£100) as their cut in the adoption process.

The magazine said the illegal ‘adoptions’ peaked in 2005, but continued for nearly a decade. Mr Yang, whose marriage was destroyed by the incident, says he was later offered the chance to have two further children if he agreed not to make trouble over the enforced ‘adoption’ of his child.”

Chinese babies sold abroad for adoption for £2,000
[The Telegraph 5/10/11 by Peter Foster]

Family-planning officials took & sold babies: report
[Global Times 5/10/11 Liu Linlin]

Update: This article has a good synopsis.

” In the wake of the Caixin story, Hunan provincial officials have officially begun a probe into the alleged cases, which involve some 20 children from Longhui county over the past decade. But previous attempts by family members to locate their children were thwarted by local officials, says the Chinese magazine. Keeping population growth figures low is one way for local bureaucrats to gain promotion, and the link has led to various abuses nationwide, including forced abortions of late-term fetuses. Caixin claims that some of the children weren’t even in violation of the one-child policy. But their parents were migrant workers who had little control of the removal of their offspring from family homes.The scandal also hints at one less reported fact: the declining number of Chinese girls available for overseas adoption. Traditionally, Chinese families have preferred boys because they will stay in the family home when they grow up, enabling them to take care of their elderly parents. Unwanted girls crowded Chinese orphanages; most overseas adoptions of Chinese babies, therefore, involved girls. But in part because of widespread access to sonograms, Chinese women have taken to aborting female fetuses. Doing so is illegal but commonplace. Indeed, China’s latest census results this year show that the country’s gender ratio is now 118 boys to every 100 girls.

Baby-selling has occurred in other countries that offered children for adoption, most notably in Cambodia and Vietnam, where the abuse had been so rampant that countries like the U.S. put moratoriums on adoptions from those places. But a further tragedy of baby-trafficking is that it hurts the chances of truly needy kids finding adoptive parents, as the entire process is tainted by allegations of malfeasance. Homes are needed for many babies. But, as the Hunan case appears to show, finding the right children can sometimes be deceptively difficult.”

Have Foreigners Unwittingly Adopted Victims of Baby-Selling in China
[Time 5/11/11 by Hannah Beech]

REFORM Puzzle Piece

Trafficking2

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *