Korean Interview with Holt Regarding Disabled and Male Children in Need

Not surprisingly when a major US adoption agency is interviewed, they will state that the only solution for placement of disabled children is international adoption. This is the case in the new article Foreign adoption quota leaves behind disabled and male children [The Korea Times 11/30/11] Our comments in red: “On a cloudy, misty morning, several women cooed over a six-week-old baby with a black shock of hair. The women in this domestic scene, however, aren’t a mother, grandmothers and aunts. They are housemothers and volunteers at the Holt Ilsan Town Center for disabled children and adults. The child, who has Down syndrome, has the characteristically pudgy face and small eyes of someone with his condition. He was found abandoned in a hotel wastebasket soon after birth, said Molly Holt, the head of Holt International Children’s Services, an adoption agency founded by her parents Harry and Bertha. Holt’s hope is that one day this little boy and other children living at the center are adopted by international families. [Why JUST international families? Have you ever collaborated with the Korean Down Syndrome Society? We notice that is not mentioned in this article.] Due to societal issues, this baby boy has a slim chance of finding a permanent home with a Korean family, according to Lee Myung-woo, director of the post-adoption counseling department at Holt International. [Yes, it is difficult to place these children domestically. Now that there are More benefits for couples who adopt disabled children in South Korea what is YOUR organization doing to help this effort?] “Korean people are rather picky in adoption with their own preferences for same blood type, pretty (looks) and health, the education background of birth parents, et cetera,” Lee said. “In domestic adoption, more than 70 percent are girls. Boys and disabled children may have to find homes abroad, or may have to be transferred to institutions if we would ever fail to send them for overseas adoptions for the reason of government policy.” Lee was referring to the Korean government’s adoption quota system introduced in 2007, which limits and lowers the number of Korean children adopted by foreign families. In hopes of encouraging domestic adoption, the policy dictates that internationally permitted adoptions be reduced 10 percent annually with the ultimate goal of eliminating all foreign adoptions. [It is interesting that you don’t mention that this coincides with the disability rights movement in Korea. New hospitals, schools, personal assistant services and more. This 2011 pdf explains more.] “But now with the quota system, this baby has no chance of being adopted,” Holt said. “We’ve already reached our foreign quota for this year.” [You mean no chance being adopted INTERNATIONALLY or through YOUR AGENCY, right?] Before the quota’s introduction, Holt said, it was easier for foreigners to adopt less-disabled or male children. According to Holt’s statistics, at the end of this July, of 244 children who were adopted, 38 disabled children and 172 boys joined international families. Just three years ago in 2008, nearly triple the number of disabled and male children were adopted into homes overseas. [What does your business statistic have to do with the actual numbers of kids in need and how many were helped? It just sounds like you are moaning about a drop in business. The important numbers that this article fails to mention are how many disabled children have been helped overall by ALL types of services. This does not even talk about whether abandonments of disabled children have decreased since services have been ramping up. That also is important to know.] “These numbers keep dropping due to the quota situation,” said Lee, the counselor for Holt. Melissa Corkum, an American, and her husband were one of the few couples who adopted a special-needs male child from Korea in 2009. “We think domestic adoption is preferable over international adoption if at all possible,” said Corkum, who devoted a year to the adoption process. “It’s sad but the integration of domestic adoption into the culture will take time and is a process. We would like to see harder-to-place children available to international adoption but, at the same time, the U.S. is leaving behind plenty of children itself.” [You don’t mention Korea signing onto Hague though?] The Holt agency started in the 1950s with the goal of finding homes for abandoned war orphans. By 2000, it had grown into a major agency that handled about 1,000 international adoptions per year. Today, the agency’s Ilsan center houses around 270 disabled residents, some of whom were abandoned children. Although Koreans in general stopped abandoning their children in the 1980s, babies with health problems or disabilities still suffer that fate today. [Now the article starts to confuse the reader by throwing in ADULT disabled statistics with child disabled statistics. How many of those 270 are kids? Also, it is interesting that Koreans have generally stopped abandoning kids in the past 30 years. Hmmm…maybe that is why the business stats are down? And if they have stopped abandoning, then how is the percentage of  healthy kids higher now than before. You just got done lamenting that the rate of disabled kids is down which must mean the percentage of healthy kids is higher.] To encourage domestic adoption, in 2005 the government started many incentives. May 11 was designated as Adoption Day. The government now pays for all adoption expenses and health insurance until the child turns 18, gives a child-care grant to the family for 13 years after placement and provides a psychological therapy fee when necessary, on behalf of adoptive parents. [Now they mention the important stuff after the heartstrings have been pulled.] According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the number of Korean families who adopted last year did rise by 11 percent to over 1,400 from 2009, while the number of international adoptions fell to around 1,000. But compared to 2005, the number of domestic adoptions was nearly unchanged, while the number for international families surpassed 2,100. [But I thought you just said that Koreans haven’t been abandoning kids for the past 30 years, so why should placements be going up?] The ministry’s latest statistics show that in 2008, more than 9,000 children were in need of state care, with almost 5,000 in institutional care. Forty were disabled. [Pardon? 40 are disabled? 40. Missing any zeros there? Just 40? So maybe the kids just go straight to foster care and to the US then? 14,000 children out of about 8 million children and a total population of 49 million.] “The quota system has not boosted domestic adoption much,” said Stephen Morrison of Mission to Promote Adoption in Korea (MPAK). “The fact is that over 90 percent of domestic adoption cases in Korea, children are adopted by the time they turn 3 months old. So holding them for another three months just to satisfy another 10 percent adoption in domestic Korea is a real disservice to children who should go to loving homes earlier.” [Yes, that hurts business doesn’t it? How DARE they hold them for three months!] Yet, the quotas and new adoption legislation grant more rights to the birth mothers as well as the children in question. [Gasp! MORE mother rights? CHILDREN’s RIGHTS?!? JCICS’ heads must be exploding!] “Children with disabilities are often left behind in the adoption dialogue in general. We believe the government should provide stronger social welfare support to families with children with disabilities so the families have the option of keeping their child,” said Jenny Na of Adoptee Solidarity Korea, a group that advocates for adoption alternatives. For now, the fact remains: Disabled and male children are still not as adoptable. [You know, it will probably ALWAYS be that way. Most PAPs want young, healthy girls. There is no sign that this worldwide demand is letting up.] Back in Ilsan, the six-week-old baby boy is being moved to a different location on the center’s vast compound. In his place is an 18-month-old boy who has been transferred over because he has shown signs of delayed mental progress. “His chances for being adopted are slim, too, because he’ll be too old by next year,” Holt said.