REFORM Talk Notice-Uganda February 13, 2012 UPDATED

By on 2-14-2012 in International Adoption, REFORM Talk Notice, Uganda, Unethical behavior

REFORM Talk Notice-Uganda February 13, 2012 UPDATED

Since DOS doesn’t seem to be issuing warnings or closures in a timely fashion or ever in some cases, I figured, why shouldn’t we do it?

Adoptive parents on the ground in Uganda are reporting unethical practices at several levels of the process. This is very much like what we have reported about Ethiopia.

See Rileys in Uganda for the warning signs on unethical adoption agencies, lawyers and children’s homes and what type of information you should be DEMANDING from your agency.

How the children are being relinquished and how long the child has been in the orphanage before placement are key questions that you should have answers to before completing the adoption.

REFORM Puzzle Pieces

Satisfying a “customer” order for a child is not what international adoption should be about.

Update: PEAR has issued an Ethics Notice. They call for an investigation in their March 8, 2012 post
They list ethical concerns as follows:
“Ethical concerns include:

1. Reports that US adoption agencies are making donations to existing orphanages to thwart efforts at family reunification;
2. Reports of harvesting of children from intact families in order to provide more “adoptable” children for intercountry adoption (children screened for suitable health, gender, and age);
3. Reports of extensive bribes paid to local officials by US adoption agencies and/or their local facilitators;
4. Reports of bribes paid to local officials by US adopting families;
5. Failure of the Ugandan government and US government to demonstrate a commitment to transparency and honesty in addressing concerns over the slowing of the process for approving Ugandan passports for adopted children;
6. Recent reports that US adopting families are being advised to take children into Kenya for processing Ugandan passport applications. We are concerned about this practice and the possible repercussions of US citizens flying undocumented children across international borders.”

Update 2: A new article explains another ethical dilemma. Two American nurses stationed in Uganda were asked to care for an infant from a mother who at the time had untreated mental illness. So, what do they do? They start recruiting an American family to adopt. They, like so many other health professionals, turned into adoption agents.
A judge grants the US family guardianship, but the US Embassy denies their application. The mother who was in a hospital disappeared. The PAPs had attempted to get the uncle and the two American nurses to “relinquish.” The denial is due to strict rules for qualifying as an orphan when the parent has mental illness: “The child of an unwed mother or surviving parent may be considered an orphan if that parent is unable to care for the child properly and has, in writing, irrevocably released the child for emigration and adoption.” So, they got a judge to sign off on the mother’s behalf and are trying again. When in a bind, just alter the paperwork.
“Ryan and Lindsey Doyle checked their email constantly, waiting for news.

The Brentwood couple was in Uganda in November trying to adopt Eden Hannah, an 8-month-old orphan, but ended up mired in bureaucratic red tape from two countries. It had been three weeks since they resubmitted a visa application to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services as legal guardians, and this time, they hoped that including the biological mother’s diagnosis of severe mental illness would make a difference.

It didn’t. Their request was denied. They would come home from Africa alone, and they’re still at home, still waiting, still praying.

We had provided them everything that they had asked for,” said Ryan Doyle, youth pastor and Bible teacher at Christ Presbyterian Church and Academy. “We were devastated, thinking that our chance at bringing her home had just slipped through our hands, and the wait to be with her had to continue.”

Their case demonstrates challenges American couples face in trying to adopt from Africa — a web of paperwork, conflicting government policies and financial strain. There’s been a sharp decline in overall international adoptions in recent years, from nearly 23,000 in 2004 to 9,320 last year, said Corey Barron of the St. Louis-based Children’s Hope Adoption Agency.

“These protective measures ensure there isn’t any child trafficking going on, and that is a very good thing,” he said. [Think again on that!]

But Barron also criticized some cumbersome U.S. policies that pile paperwork onto too few immigration workers and slow down legitimate adoptions.

“They have overwhelmed the infrastructure of adoptions,” Barron said.

“It looks like Immigration has one office for all of Africa.” [Maybe if there were not so many major paper discrepancies like birthmother DISAPPEARS, they wouldn’t be so overwhelmed!]

No adoption agency

The Doyles aren’t using an agency and instead are doing an independent adoption. Their story began in March 2011 in Uganda, when concerned relatives removed newborn Eden Hannah from her biological mother, who suffered from untreated schizophrenia, and took her to the Masindi police station.

The authorities gave her to two American nurses from South Carolina working with the Palmetto Medical Initiative, a hospital in Masindi.

“We got the reputation of people who were willing to take care of unwanted babies,” said Mandie Joy Turner, 25, one of the nurses who cared for Eden Hannah and six other orphans.

The nurses gave the baby medical care but also reached out to America, hoping to find an adoptive family.

The baby weighed 4 pounds, was drug addicted and bore a tribal name meaning “cursed.”

The nurses renamed her the more cheerful Eden Hannah, which partially means “delight.” After enduring weeks of screaming and sleepless nights with the drug-addicted infant, Turner wondered about that choice.

“She was anything but a delight,” Turner said. “We gave her that name in faith.”

In May, a Nashville couple who had adopted twins from the nurses ran into the Doyles at a school piano recital and told them about Eden Hannah.

The Doyles have four young children, the youngest a boy adopted from Uganda in 2009, and had been praying to add a girl to the family. Lindsey Doyle works from home for a family business.

Turner texted her a picture of Eden Hannah during the piano recital, and tears sprang to her eyes.

“When I saw her picture for the first time, I was overjoyed, even giddy,” Lindsey Doyle said. “We had been praying the Lord would lead us to our next child. As I looked at her picture, I hoped it would be us that would be chosen to love her forever. Now, that moment seems like years ago.”

She was on a plane to Uganda by October to care for the baby while her husband and other relatives watched the children back home.

For seven weeks, she rocked Eden Hannah. With no cribs available, they slept in the same bed.

Joy, disappointment

In November, Ryan Doyle joined his wife in front of a Ugandan judge. Eden Hannah’s uncle and the nurses who cared for her all signed irrevocable releases on behalf of her biological mother — who was ruled incapable of understanding the legalities at hand — and granted legal guardianship to the Doyles.

Then everything unraveled. [Actually, they just didn’t seem to comprehend what the definition of “orphan” is from immigration law.]

Days before Thanksgiving, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denied their application for Eden Hannah’s visa. The baby’s biological mother, a patient at Butabika Mental Hospital in Kampala, Uganda, had escaped. Her whereabouts remain unknown.

That’s a serious development, Barron said, because in cases of mental illness, the U.S. Embassy requires clinical documentation to verify a child’s orphan status. That office, in Nairobi, Kenya, has denied the Doyles’ application twice, citing a need for more evidence and an official signature from the biological mother relinquishing her rights.

“They never asked for her signature until now, now that she is gone from the hospital,” Lindsey Doyle said. “Even if she signs it, the U.S. Embassy could deny it on account of her mental condition.”

On Tuesday, the Doyles’ Ugandan attorneys obtained a document that may satisfy the requirement.

The release, which used English wording to more clearly sever all parental rights, was signed by a Ugandan judge on behalf of the biological mother.

The Doyles hope the inclusion of the release with their third visa application will confirm Eden Hannah’s status as a true orphan, and they finally will be able to bring her home.

Trapped in a legal conundrum, the Doyles say, they need a miracle. They have been showered with spiritual and financial support through their church, Christ Presbyterian in Nashville, but still, they can’t bring their daughter home.

“We never imagined our own government would prevent sweet Eden Hannah from coming home,” said church member Dana Keck, whose family adopted a son from Uganda in 2009. “Our hearts break with the Doyles because we know what it feels like to be separated from your child.”

[The Tennessean 4/1/12by Claire C. Gibson]
Update 3: A former US Embassy Uganda employee, Freda, has left her adoption case review position to join a local NGO. In an April 2, 2012 AP blog, she explains the dire ethical circumstances of Ugandan adoptions. http://www.familyhopelove.com/?p=474 shares her words.
A few key excerpts: “The amount of child trafficking I have seen is unbelievable, someone needed to do something because unfortunately the unethical adoptions were the majority. Its unbelievable how many American parents have been conned and duped into adopting non orphans only to find out the truth later.”  and
“It’s very unbelievable how numbers of adopted children shot up by 300% in months, that really says something to me especially:- When I know that in over 90% of those cases, little or nothing was done to follow the continuum of alternative care prior to being referred for adoption.
And also that in over 99% of the cases, the children had never had a probation and social work report (they had never been visited by a social worker) until they had to court date for their adoption and that the adoptive parent is the one that paid for the report!
We also can not hide from the illegal institutionalization of innocent children, the corruption involved in the whole adoption process and the over charges.”
Update 4: “In 2009 Anna Kalmbacher and her husband Gabriel adopted two boys from Uganda after spending time there doing missionary work.“You can’t go into it blindly or else you’re going to be taken advantage of, or the child is going to be taken advantage of,” Kalmbacher said of the Ugandan adoption process.

As Kalmbacher and her husband waited for their sons, a corrupt orphanage charged them a mandatory donation fee weekly for the boys, then aged two and two-and-a-half.

“That is a big red flag when looking at adoption referrals,” she said.

She got her boys before the recent Ugandan adoption boom, which began in 2011, with 207 adoptions taking place compared to just 62 in 2010.

Because Russia closed its doors to U.S. adoption and China’s process now has wait times of up to six years, African countries such as Uganda, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo are stepping up as the main sources for U.S. parents.

Although sometimes the fastest to deliver, those countries do not always have the safest, most ethical systems from which to adopt.

Kalmbacher, now president of child advocacy adoption nonprofit A Child’s Voice, has seen firsthand the problems in Uganda since the boom.

“We personally know of too many situations where orphanages have actually been exposed as trafficking children for adoption, for instance getting $1,000 a child,” Kalmbacher said.

UNICEF’s Humanitarian Action Report estimates that at least 1.2 million people in Uganda need humanitarian relief because of droughts, flooding, and displacement. In addition, nearly 2.5 million children have lost one or both parents to AIDS.

The weak infrastructure in the African country could not handle the quick rise of adoption and the influx of money and corruption.

Often, the quest for money involves adoption facilitators recruiting children, a process known as “trolling the slums.”

“You have these facilitators approaching very vulnerable families who don’t have a lot of options and don’t even know about adoption maybe,” Kalmbacher said.

Many parents in third world countries simply don’t understand the Western concept of adoption and believe the arrangement is temporary. Chuck Johnson, president of the National Council for Adoption, said parents often think orphanages are like boarding schools.

“Parents intend on coming to get their children back someday,” Johnson said.

Other times, parents just see a wealthy facilitator or hear America mentioned and are willing to let their kids go.

“It’s…the idea that America will fix all of your problems or that a child going to America will automatically be rich,” Kalmbacher said.

And it may seem that American prospective parents are rich, as adoption agencies charge $25,000 to $35,000 per child for the process in Uganda.

The Boom and Bust Cycle

The situation in Uganda is not unique. Ethiopia, the third most popular country for U.S. parents to adopt from in 2012, has had the same allegations of corruption.

Kathryn Joyce, journalist and author of The Child Catchers, spent time in Ethiopia examining those allegations.

“A lot of adoption reform advocates will come in after the boom and bust happens and the storybook corruption starts to come out,” Joyce said.

Many parents of Ethiopian children turned to searchers, independent researchers who can be hired to verify a child’s background. The searchers work from documents provided by an adoption agency to either find cases of fraud or provide cultural information to families.

In some cases, the results were disturbing.

“Sometimes parents are not dead who were said to be dead,” Joyce said.

Again the root of the problem was money.

“It’s not as though any one person in Ethiopia is getting a $30,000 or $35,000 adoption fee, but that money does filter down to people in the country and it does prompt the sort of unethical or corrupt dealings that some parents have found,” Joyce said.

The Role Adoptive Parents Play

Unfortunately, adoptive parents are also part of the reason behind corruption in countries like Uganda and Ethiopia.

Karen Moline, a board member of Parents for Ethical Adoption Reform, said many ignore ethical questions in their desperation for a child.

“If you think you’re saving a soul then you can more likely overlook what is bringing that soul to you,” Moline said.

Many parents are also often looking for a specific kind of child. Typically, they want to adopt a baby girl, a preference that may encourage recruitment of children.

“It’s possible to have an ethical adoption from Uganda if you’re doing your due diligence, if you’re working with the right people and you’re willing to adopt children that are truly in need of adoption rather than trying to find a child that meets your desired child profile,” Kalmbacher said.

Research is another way to make sure you’re not receiving a trafficked child. It’s important to look into fees and make sure there are no gag orders, and you should also make sure you can hire a third party investigator to verify your kid’s story.

“When you’re paying someone money for a service, you would expect the right to be able to independently vet that story,” Kalmbacher said.

Anna Kalmbacher’s Family

A year after adopting her two boys, Kalmbacher and her husband heard about a little girl who was deathly ill and up for adoption. The little girl and a biological son born later joined the family who now live in Michigan.

Kalmbacher said her kids have inspired her to do more for the children of Uganda.

“I can’t even imagine not having them in our life and us in their life, and at the same time I don’t feel like just adopting our children is all that I’m called to do.””

[Medill on the Hill 3/13/13 by Catherine Reid]

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *