Some Ontario Adoptive Parents Excluded from New Adoption Subsidy
For the purpose of encouraging older child adoption, starting “June 15 [2012], Ontarians with net family incomes up to $85,000 who adopt siblings or children age 10 and older from Children’s Aid will receive monthly subsidies of $950 per child.
But Phaneuf and Barth — and others whose adoptions have already been finalized — don’t qualify.”
“Families who don’t qualify for the new subsidies are still eligible for other financial assistance available through their local Children’s Aid Society, he added.”
“Ontario’s 2009 Expert Panel on Infertility and Adoption recommended a provincial adoption subsidy program for all children 2 and older.
Panel member William Falk said he is pleased sibling groups have been included in the new adoption subsidy. Although he said age 10 is “too high” for other adoption subsidies, it is “still a good place to start given limited funds.”
New Ontario adoption subsidies exclude parents who have already adopted
[Toronto Star 6/14/12 by Laurie Monsebraaten]
“Many of the province’s Children’s Aid Societies already provide subsidies for children with special needs, but until now it has been a patchwork quilt, said Virginia Rowden of the Ontario Association of Children’s Aid Societies, which represents the province’s 53 CASs.
Agencies are pleased the new program sets a specific amount that will be available to all adoptive families across the province with no spending cap, she said. And they are happy local agencies will continue to be able to offer their own subsidies or provide top-ups.
“For people who are contemplating adopting, they know up-front what is available. And it is on-going as long as the families continue to qualify,” Rowden said.
“Overall it’s a better investment than continuing to pay foster care because it provides better outcomes at a better cost,” she added.
There are about 8,300 Crown wards in Ontario. Of the 1,000 children adopted through Children’s Aid last year, 73 per cent were under age 5, just one-quarter were between the ages of 6 and 11, and only 2 per cent were over age 12.”
Ontario will subsidize adoption of kids over 10
[Toronto Star 6/4/12 by Laurie Monsebraaten]
REFORM Puzzle Piece
The $950 per month is ” 60 per cent of the average cost Children’s Aid Societies pay foster parents in Ontario.” It remains to be seen if more parents choose to adopt children over age 10. This seems to be a feel-good legislation that primarily is for cost-cutting and not for better care for the children nor better quality of parents.
I wonder if that $950 per month would be better spent helping to keep families together (vs. trying to get kids adopted AFTER their first family has been deemed unsuitable). There is no question that there are kids that cannot safely remain in their first families… but there are a ton of kids who get removed from their families for neglect-due-to-lack-of-$$, and for those kids, $950 would probably go a long way towards enabling them to stay with their bio families.
On the other hand, I’m pretty uncomfortable with the idea of PAYING parents to care for their own children, i.e. once the kid is YOUR kid, not a foster kid temporarily in your care. I’m especially uncomfortable about paying parents to care for their kids in Canada (vs. US) because in the Great White North the government already provides all kinds of important services to families, i.e. everybody’s entitled to 9 mos parental leave at 96% of their salary. healthcare and various ST, OT, therapies are free, day care is heavily regulated and subsidized (i.e. $7 per day per kid day care for everybody in the province of Quebec, with teachers required to have a college degree and a teaching certificate, even for preschool age kids), etc. There’s a whole lot of infrastructure already in place to help families raise their kids….
Carlee,
I don’t think many kids will qualify for this -if only 2% of kids are being adopted at age 12. From what I have read, Canada is having issues with availability of therapists like the US. I do worry that this will draw abusive or neglectful people into fostering.
Ah, didn’t know/hadn’t realised re: thereapist availability.
I do share your concern that the $$ ($950 is quite a bit of money) could attract abusive or neglectful people into fostering.