FacePalm Friday

By on 2-22-2013 in FacePalm Friday

FacePalm Friday

Welcome to this week’s edition of FacePalm Friday.

This is where your hosts will list their top picks for this week’s FacePalm moment—something they learned or read about this week that caused the FacePalm to happen (you know, the expression of embarrassment, frustration, disbelief, shock, disgust or mixed humor as depicted in our Rally FacePalm smiley).

We invite you to add your FacePalm of the week to our comments. Go ahead and add a link, tell a personal story, or share something that triggered the FacePalm on the subject of child welfare or adoption.

Your Host’s Selections:

(1)CCAI’s promotion of STUCK and itself

See their blog post here. It really is pathetic that the industry along with elected officials are putting all their effort into this one last hope for cashflow-showcasing corrupted countries. At least they are transparent in their blogroll on which journalists are totally in the tank for them-David Brooks of NYT and Andrea Poe of Washington Times. Just a fancy version of this:

Con man smile

(2)Adoptee events that double as propaganda gathering to keep adoptions flowing

Surprise! http://zaazu.comHelp us with some propaganda before you get http://zaazu.com!

(3)The 9th Annual  Wells Conference on Adoption Law: “Rethinking Children’s Best Interests” description of Dusten Brown’s Father’s Rights/ICWA case

You can tell the slant this is going to have: “One of the highlights of this year’s conference is a discussion of the Indian Child Welfare Act and children’s best interests, featuring this highly publicized case in which a child was removed from her adoptive family after her biological father, a member of the Cherokee tribe, asserted his rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act. ”

Why no mention that the adoptive parents (one who is a developmental psychologist) went along with Nightlight adoptions and the so-called text message signing away of rights and kept the child FROM Dusten for 2 years ? Yes they apparently did this http://zaazu.com for two years and STILL are with their US Supreme Court case

(4)”By The Numbers: Adoption Is Safe” commentary

By The Numbers: Adoption Is Safe

[Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty 2/20/13 by Zach Peterson]

Another commentary about how Russian adoptee deaths are no big deal and in this one, the author thinks there is no proof that 20 of them have died. Try Google , you dimwit. He also doesn’t realize that the lower placements to the US have no correlation to how many children need international adoptive homes. He just assumes all of them do and therefore a lower number must be bad.

“Although the numbers say the practice is prefectly [sic]safe…” well except for all those that have bad outcomes, though, right?  I must bring back this smiley:

(5)Adoptive Sister’s Reflection on Adoption blog post
The Adoption Firm

The US Federal government says so, so it must be true Saluteand she speaks for her adopted sister and all adoptees too!
“International adoption critics love to argue that displacing children from their native ethnic and racial background robs them of their heritage and leaves them confused and lost in a new culture. These claims are wrong. The United States federal government has debated this issue, and it has been studied extensively by psychologists. Transracial and transcultural adoptees face no more psychological risks than adoptees of the same race and ethnicity as their parents. In fact, families will often make an effort to integrate their adopted child’s native culture into their lives. Many families learn their child’s native language or go to great lengths to take their child back to his or her native country. Since her adoption, my sister has traded her Chinese culture for American, but she has not suffered any deprivation. On the contrary, she is blessed. What matters most to her is not her birthplace, but that she has been cared for by a loving family and given the opportunities to have a better life than she could have had before.”

Crazy stats: “”In fact, out of the 167 million orphans, 120 million will never receive any education whatsoever. About 60% of these orphaned girls will become prostitutes, and 70% of these boys will become criminals by the age of 18” scuba diving in menorca WTF Question Mark Sign60 to 70% of 167 million orphans WILL become prostitutes?And completely UNSCHOOLED too

 

On Birthfathers “Domestic adoption is much cheaper, but it is not without drawbacks. During the adoption process, birth parents can change their minds and unknown biological fathers can emerge and demand the rights to their child.” http://zaazu.com those fathers that want to parent their children!http://zaazu.com

And transracial adoption is “trivial” and adoption cures racism!

“In the end the decision to adopt is a matter of heart. A child is a child, and birthplace cannot erase that fact. Both domestic and international adoption come with risks and difficulties, but when a child is waiting for their “forever family,” as my mother says, these challenges are trivial. Robert Dale Morrison once said, “The quickest cure for racism would be to have everyone in the country adopt a child of another race. No matter what your beliefs, when you hold a four-day-old infant, love him, and care for him, you don’t see skin color, you see a little person that is very much in need of your love.”

 

(6)Article by Jane Aronson and upcoming book

Abinet: From Orphan to Philanthropist [Huffington Post 2/18/13]

Her favorite notes…contain …Her new book , Carried in Our Hearts: The Gift of Adoption, Inspiring Stories of Families Created Across Continents, to be published on Mother’s Day, May 12, 2013. Raining hearts

(7)God’s call to adoption article

http://chimes.biola.edu/story/2013/feb/20/God-adoption-Biola/ [2/20/13 by Nicole Foy]

“The Styffe family, working with Saddleback Church in Southern California and the government of Rwanda, were instrumental in the establishment of the country’s first adoption agencies — opening the doors for hundreds of families to adopt. The Styffes have no doubt that God had a hand in bringing them together.” You know what is hilarious about this? They fail to mention the  JCICS connection-they sent a certain adoption agency to Rwanda with Saddleback back in 2008..guess who? GLADNEY See here and they felt the need to enter into the Hague Convention after these adoptions too.

“Instead of perpetuating orphanages, Rachel emphasized the necessity of placing children in loving, Christ-centered households” [Even if the children aren’t Christian?Even if they have families..no family preservation? The government is already trying to phase orphanages out ]

“When Jason Oakes, a professor in the biblical studies department, was considering adoption, he too found a confirmation and call to care for the orphans while reading a scripture passage about the fatherless. He and his wife felt a strong conviction to adopt immediately and let the finances work themselves out”3D Smiley Says No Way

“The freshman communication studies major explained that even though he remembers picking up his adopted sister, Samantha, from China when he was 6 years old, he could never consider her to be any different than his younger biological brother.

“The way that we say it now, is that she has been my sister all along, she just got delivered in the wrong place,” Sweeney said.”Cool NO

 

(8)Senator Mary Landrieu

From inserting herself as spokewoman for Max Shatto case to talking about reopening Vietnam, she is a nonstop FacePalm. She chooses to gloss over all of the known corruptions without batting an eyelash.

She is as annoying as I Hate Flies

or getting this for your birthday: Gift Box with a piece of Shit

or having this happen on your way to the coffee shop:Alien Abduction

or having this guy show up for your blind date: Ugly Man Laugh

or doing this on a Saturday night

or listening to this coworker Click here for more graphics and gifs!

or dealing with your computer again  Click here for more graphics and gifs!

or this

There are not enough Smiley face swearing on Earth to express how much I want to tell her this: 

16 Comments

  1. This is one for the ages! Especially #8!!!!!

  2. Horrid fundraising page called “Saving the China Doll”

    http://m.facebook.com/SavingTheChinaDoll?id=499638000068111&_rdr

  3. Yet another utterly unprepared Reece’s Rainbow PAP/AP beseeching others to adopt despite having $0 funds of their own to contribute if they believe a supernatural being told them to.

    You may recall that this family adopted 2 unrelated Ukrainian SN kids just a few months ago – and is going back for a third.

    They also blogged about the fancy 5* Disney vacation they took — because vacations are their family’s “thing” and they booked it before the deity told them to adopt kid #3 and appear to feel said deity was ok with them spending *their* hard-earned cash on Disney since *other people’s* money would cover their adoption costs).

    My bible seems to be missing the page where Jesus advises splashing out on frivolities for oneself rather than helping the poor/old/sick/etc.

    “$30,000 is a LOT of money. Many a husband have absolutely refused to even look at a child’s profile, because they feel the enormous weight of where $30,000 is going to come from.

    I want to encourage you all. Not only can it be done, I believe and have experienced in my own life that God is faithful to the orphan. I’ve been around this adoption community for over 2 years, now. In that time, I haven’t seen one truly committed family not bring their children home, due to lack of funding…

    … We didn’t have the money to commit, but God had clearly spoken to us. We were walking boldly where He had called us. We signed the agency agreement, knowing that first $2000 needed to go toward our homestudy and having no idea where the $3500 commitment fees that needed to be mailed within the next week or two were coming from. 3 days later, a friend handed me an envelope with a check inside. A check made out for $3500. It was a huge sacrifice for their family. They believed in what we were doing.

    We continued to fundraise, in April we added a second child and while he had a grant for $7500. It wouldn’t be enough to cover the cost of adding him. We continued moving forward, sure that God had called us to this child also. Again, the money wasn’t there, but the assurance of a faithful God was”.

    You cannot save these folks from themselves **sigh**

    http://www.findingourlittleone.com/2013/02/the-cost-of-adoption.html?m=1

  4. I’m so thankful you shared part of our family’s testimony here on your blog. I pray that people will come and read the full story of God’s provision at the link you provided.

    I read how concerned you are that families who fundraise for their adoptions, must not be able to take care of their children once they get them home. Obviously, for those of us who can afford to take our children to Disney World this is not a problem 🙂

    I would like to say that none of my children are from the Ukraine and so, their listings were not illegal. I have done my best to protect their privacy, while sharing truth about what adoption looks like from the inside out. I am thankful that their birth parents chose life and saddened that they lived in a place where they didn’t feel as though they could take care of them. I feel privileged to be able to parent them well.

    However, I don’t believe we were the plan that God intended for them. I believe, instead, that we live in a broken, sin-filled world. I believe that God’s plan involved them being raised and loved by their biological parents. Since, that reality did not occur, I feel like we are a better solution than being raised in an institution.

    One of my sons came to us at 7 years old weighing 22 pounds, unable to walk, talk, potty, etc. He has been home 8 months and has gained 12 pounds and grown over 3 inches. He’s walking with a walker and I’m not sure how anyone could think that it was better for him to stay in that orphanage.

    I pray that you continue to read blogs and learn more about our faithful God and his great love for the orphan.

  5. It is so wonderful that you have enough money for Disney trips but not adoption fees. Jesus would totally approve of you spending your hard-earned money on fripperies like fancy hotels and expensive meals in Disney theme parks rather than adoption fees for the little girl you claim to love so much.

    Very reasonable. Shows you have your priorities truly in order. It will be such a great story to tell the girl you hope to adopt – your third unrelated special needs kid in under a year
    – that because you love Jesus and vacations so much, she likely got to spend a few extra months without a mommy and a daddy and appropriate medical care and adequate food to eat or any caregiver to give her the one-on-one attention she so desperately needs. You should totally be sure to write about it in the life book you’ll no doubt be preparing for her!

    God forbid the girl you claim to love so much falls ill or even dies — little RR “Megan” supposedly did this week, a darling with a committed family!! — before you beg the $$ from strangers you need to complete her adoption. You totally won’t have any regrets because the $1000 you spent on admission to theme parks will have been totally worth it, right??

    I’m guessing your adopted kids are Bulgarian – where photolistings are illegal too. Or has the law changed recently?

    • Photo listings are not illegal in Bulgaria. Adoption of pre-identified special needs children is not illegal in Bulgaria. Someone, somewhere, from some reputable place, show me where the referral photograph of a child in Bulgaria is illegal. It’s part of the legal referral for the child; it’s part of the legal documentation of a pre-identified waiting child. Conjecture is crap.

      Mandy, God bless you, but you will make no headway here. Adoption is not an answer. There really isn’t an answer here, ever. Occasionally, the discussion turns to how “others” (I have no idea who) should just send money to these countries so they can magically develop early intervention programs and in one fell swoop transform their populace into a nation of people who value all special needs. Curb cut outs for those in wheelchairs will be funded and prioritized, schools will morph into places where children with special needs can be educated, these countries will suddenly find ways to create their version of IEPs. At the minimum, we’ll just send stipends to the biological families so that they can spend the money on therapists and specialists…that rarely exist in these nations. It’s the same false reality that some APs take when they believe it’s all just “love” and they can adopt ten kids at once. They all drink from the same hypocrisy, but the good folks here pretend to have better stats and higher morals. Listen, God isn’t too popular here, so you might want to save your breath on that one, too.

      • LOL you are a hoot! Yes, that darned unoffical site called the US Department of State is such CONJECTURE http://adoption.state.gov/country_information/country_specific_info.php?country-select=bulgaria Of course there is an approved procedure for waiting children. It does not consist of PAPs or other “advocaters” freely disseminating private child information on their whim. Accredited adoption agencies have information on waiting children and in order to view it, the ethical ones require you to submit the information that you already have an approved homestudy. This is done so in accordance with how Hague regulations work and Gasp that also follows the instructions on that conjecture-site called US Department of State. Kepp on keeping on with your “faith” in unethical adoption entities and their so-called procedures.

        And for the 1 millionth time, we are for ethical adoptions. Those are kinds that follow the UN CRC guidelines that after inability to place the child back with original family that domestic options are pursued next followed by international placement options. Gasp! How RADICAL of us! Wow we must not love God if we think this way, huh? LOL Again I will refer readers to what anti-adoption is and is not https://reformtalk.net/2011/09/27/tuesday-term-anti-adoption/

        It is so much easier to put your head back into the sand than to open your eyes to the problems. No one has ever proposed to just “send money” to countries. You have made that up and I guess that makes you feel good and spiritually better than us. We DO support the NGOs already present in these countries that are already doing work and encourage the governments to focus on solving the poverty issues that are the underlying basis for needing international adoption in the first place. We highlight these causes in all kinds of posts. Most recently we referred to Ghana and their measure to deinstitutionalize.

      • Name,

        Re: “…Occasionally, the discussion turns to how “others” (I have no idea who) should just send money to these countries so they can magically develop early intervention programs and in one fell swoop transform their populace into a nation of people who value all special needs…”

        Anyone who has the drive and perseverance to complete an international adoption– and persuade strangers to pay for it– has a lot of organizational ability and fundraising ability. If a group of such parents pooled forces to create an ethical, transparent charity, aimed at increasing the well being of disabled children instead of adopting again, then they could bring about a LOT of change. It’s just a question of where they choose to put their energy.

        Re: “…Listen, God isn’t too popular here…”

        It’s more that we don’t accept PAPs claims that “God has ordered us to pursue this adoption, and for you to give us money to do so!” at face value. This is all the more true when “God” orders adoptions which violate known, research-validated guidelines for child-centered adoptions.

  6. Mandy,

    Re: “…Obviously, for those of us who can afford to take our children to Disney World this is not a problem…”

    So why are you begging other people for money to pay for this adoption? Just forgo your next trip to Disney World until you’ve accumulated enough money again.

  7. We will forgo vacation this year. It will save us about $2,000. That won’t fund an adoption 🙂 We need help, we’re not too proud to ask for it. We can provide a good life for our kids, that was my point. Our boys, now, have access to therapy, education, medical treatment, love that they weren’t accessing in their birth country. Our adoption was completely ethical and we did follow the rules given to us by our agency and our country.

    • Wow. What a sacrifice. Giving up a Disney vacation this year to use the $$ for your adoption. I’m sure Jesus will give you a great big gold star ;0)

      Pity you were unwilling to make the HUGE sacrifice of giving up your 2012 fancy vacation – you could have been $2K closer to “Little K”.

      It’s also great that you believe your adoption was ethical — and that your darling boys are still living with you in your house, unlike some other RR kids that were murdered (Nicolai Emelyentsev), disrupted (Yuri Winkle, Emmit Bedford, the Patterson boy), deprived of the ability to breathe/walk independently due to a tragic accident (Selah Clanton) or simply shipped off to crisis respite indefinitely (Kellsey Garcia, Victor Reilly. The latter is the saddest case of all … when Kellsey and Victor lived in their Ukrainian orphanages, they at least had a shot at a “forever family” (however unlikely it may have been) – these children are no longer available for adoption (since they technically have godly, Christian US parents) but do not live at home, have not lived at home for quite some time and are unlikely ever to live at home again according to their mommies blogs).

      • There are more than 3 disrupted RR adoptions. We have been told a number much higher than the 7 we have documented in the past 2 years.

        • Renee Garcia (RR amom of Kellsey; Name notes she’s been crisis respite for a while now) wrote an interesting post today on how RR families with good intentions – including hers — get in way over their heads. From the sounds of it, her Homestudy social worker did a very poor job of preparing her family for what adopting a SN kid from a Ukrainian orphanage might entail:

          http://www.myspecialks.com/2013/02/the-stormy-side-of-rainbow.html

          • I have a lot of sympathy for Kellsey, but not much for the adults in her family. Her adoptive Mom says they had never heard of RAD (or attachment issues in general) when they adopted in what, 2009? Yeah, the social worker should have been more on top of things, but I presume she also had Google and could read one damn article on Wiki if nothing else. Not prepared enough and OMG NEVER HEARD OF IT are two different things.

            This particular family also was not all that sympathetic during the time Kellsey was with them – I know I don’t have all the info (obviously) but Renee never shared anything positive about that little girl unless people had been hounding her in comments. Mostly when Kellsey was mentioned, it was because Renee was complaining about how she needed a quiet environment (and Renee refused to cut back on her other children’s activities at all) and couldn’t tolerate heat (due to a medical condition) etc. I notice when she was going on and on about self-injury in this post, she left out the bit about the medical inability to feel pain which means Kellsey isn’t able to feel these injuries as other children do – not that they aren’t traumatic for parents, but that it’s not all RAD, here.

            It was just always obvious that there were two princesses in that house (Kassidy and Kennedy) and since Kellsey didn’t fit right in, they never accepted her. They would go to the ends of the Earth for the biological kids, but Kellsey – if they got around to it, and it didn’t disrupt the older kids’ lives it may happen.

            Now, RAD sucks, I am not denying RAD exists and is awful. But – this is not some mother who tried and tried and did what she had to in order to save the family. She refused to adjust their life the littlest bit (Hello? Going to outdoor parades in 90+ degree heat with a child who is medically unable to tolerate that, complaining that without respite you couldn’t go to Disney?) and then blamed any of Kellsey’s issues on either Kellsey or her pre-adoption life. The grandmother had to beg them to leave Kellsey with them rather than officially disrupt – and I’m sure going through a traumatic experience in her adoptive family has not made any of her struggles LESS severe!

          • Carlee,

            Renee Garcia wrote what is actually a good piece refuting a British politician’s call for euthanizing disabled children at birth.

            http://www.myspecialks.com/2013/05/an-open-letter-to-colin-brewer.html

            The troubling thing is that Kellsey isn’t even mentioned in this “open letter”. It’s written as if Kennedy was the only child with special needs Rene Garcia has.

            So– does this mean the adoption has now been legally dissolved, and the Garcia’s are editing Kellsey out of their family history, as if she’d never existed?

            Or does Renee feel unable to blurb about how Kellsey “…has not ever been a burden on her family or her community…” If so, it’s a troubling message– The lives of the disabled have worth and value, but only if their care isn’t TOO onerous. And if they provide physical affection and eye contact on the APs’ terms.

        • Both of these boys were disrupted less than a month after being brought home and were sent to live in two different states. She commited to another child less than one year later and has been commited for 8 months and has not even paid her commitment costs to move forward, no progress has been made to bring the boy home.

          Disrupted adoption- http://reecesrainbow.org/11094/sponsorearleywine

          New Boy and New Blog.
          http://reecesrainbow.org/43246/gage-11-32

          http://gatheringhisblessings.blogspot.com/

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *