Audit: Kansas DCF Failing to Protect Safety of Children

By on 8-22-2016 in Foster Care, Kansas, NCCPR

Audit: Kansas DCF Failing to Protect Safety of Children

“An audit released Wednesday accused the Kansas Department for Children and Families of failing in many cases to protect the safety of children in the state’s foster care and adoption programs, prompting two House Democrats to call for the immediate resignation of DCF Secretary Phyllis Gilmore.

But Gilmore rejected many of the report’s findings, saying auditors used faulty methods to collect their data, and she insisted the state is doing a good job of protecting children in state custody because of abuse or neglect at home.

Among the significant findings in the audit:

• DCF sometimes fails to ensure that background checks are conducted on licensed foster care providers or, when children are placed with family members, on those relatives who agree to take in those foster children.

• DCF does not always ensure that social workers conduct monthly in-home visits of children in foster care, adoptive homes or children reintegrated with their families.

• Children are often placed in foster care or adoptive homes that do not have sufficient living space or financial resources to handle them, and the agency grants about 98 percent of all requests for exceptions to standard living space and financial resource standards.

• DCF does not have an adequate process to ensure that licensed foster homes have sufficient financial resources.

• DCF has not yet implemented several recommendations for its child protective services functions that were made in another audit three years ago.

• And, under the state’s privatized child welfare system, the outside agencies that recruit and sponsor foster homes are also responsible for regulating them, setting up a potential conflict of interest.

The audit was released by the Division of Post Audit, an agency that is under the direction of a joint legislative committee.

The portion released Wednesday covered only the first phase of a wide-ranging review of DCF’s management of the foster care and adoption programs that lawmakers requested after a series of high-profile incidents in which children had died or suffered abuse abuse neglect while they were in state custody.

One of those was a 10-month-old girl,  Kadillak Poe-Jones, who died in July 2014 in Wichita when her foster father left her strapped in the back seat of a car in searing heat for two and a half hours while he was inside the home smoking marijuana.

And in November, Topeka City Councilman Jonathan Schumm  and his wife were arrested on child abuse charges. The Schumms were living in a small house in east Topeka with 16 children, including four biological children, 10 adopted children and two foster children.

Rep. Jim Ward, D-Wichita, one of the lawmakers who asked for the audit, and Rep. Jarrod Ousley, D-Merriam, both issued statements calling for DCF Secretary Gilmore to resign.

“It’s clear there are grave problems at DCF negatively impacting the safety of our state’s most vulnerable children,” Ward said. “I’m not comfortable gambling the future of our children in unsafe home environments. Now is the time to step up and get serious about improving a broken system that is failing Kansas kids. The first step toward that is getting new leadership at DCF.”

But Gilmore flatly rejected the suggestion that children in state custody are not safe.

“Twenty years ago, there was this myth that children in state custody were maltreated and unsafe, and that myth is still perpetuated here 20 years later,” said Gilmore, a licensed social worker and former state legislator. “And I ask you to join with us in putting that myth to end. It is not true, but it still is prevalent.”

Gilmore also suggested that reports such as the one released Wednesday, as well as the news media’s coverage of them, were partially to blame for the low morale among social workers and other staff at DCF.

“Staff morale is impacted by every negative statement that we read in the media,” she said. “It is a thankless job for which they are working so hard and deserve recognition for their success. Despite these things, Kansas is a leader in keeping children safe.”

Ousley said afterward that Gilmore’s comments only made him more convinced that Gilmore should step down.

“Kids are too valuable to have this sort of leadership, to have morale blamed on the media instead of leadership,” he said.

Wednesday’s report was the first of a three-phase audit of the overall performance and effectiveness of the state’s child welfare system.

The second report, expected to be released in September, will examine how well DCF is complying with state and federal regulations concerning children in state custody.

The final report, scheduled for release in December, will examine how well privatization of child welfare services has worked since it was implemented in the 1990s.

That report is expected to prompt discussions during the 2017 session about whether the state should continue with the privatized system or put DCF back in charge of directly managing child welfare services.”

Audit: Kansas failing to protect safety of children in foster care and adoption programs[Lawrence Journal-World 7/27/16 by Peter Hancock]

Opinion: Richard Wexler of the National Coalition For Child Protection Reform

“The puerile debate between Department of Children and Families Secretary Phyllis Gilmore and legislative auditors over the state of foster care in Kansas guarantees only one outcome: Children will continue to suffer. Both Gilmore and the auditors are ignoring the problem at the heart of the state’s failure.

The auditors did indeed obsess over process instead of outcomes, as Gilmore says. They complain about giving some foster parents exceptions from rules that are more about middle-class creature comforts than health or safety. But such exemptions sometimes are essential to allow children to be placed with relatives who, like the parents from whom the children were taken, often are poor. This kind of foster care — kinship care — is by far the least harmful.

But Gilmore should be glad the auditors didn’t focus on
outcomes — because the outcomes are dismal. Gilmore repeatedly cites a federal review as supposedly proving her agency does a good job keeping children safe. There are three problems with this:

■ The conclusion is based on a sample of only 40 cases. As we explain in our analysis of the federal process, this is far too small to be representative, even were it a random sample.

■ It wasn’t a random sample. DCF got to choose the cases.

■ Even with the deck stacked this way, on every other outcome measured by federal officials, Kansas flunked. Kansas failed to meet the federal standard for keeping children safely in their own homes whenever possible, failed to provide stability for foster children, and on and on.

Both Gilmore and the auditors ignored the problem at the root of all the others: The obscenely high rate at which Kansas tears children from their families. Kansas takes away children at a rate 60 percent above the national average and more than double the rate in states that are national models for keeping children safe, even when rates of child poverty are factored in.

And those are just the official figures. As we documented in our comprehensive report on Kansas child welfare, Kansas cheats — failing to tell the federal government about many foster care placements.

The problem with this is not that it hurts parents, though of course it does. The problem is that it hurts children. Most cases are nothing like the horror stories — far more common are cases in which family poverty is confused with “neglect.” So it’s no wonder that two massive studies of typical cases found that children placed in foster care typically fared worse than comparably maltreated children left in their own homes. Several other studies find high rates of abuse in foster care itself.

But even that isn’t the worst of it. It’s all those children needlessly removed who are overwhelming caseworkers, leaving them even less time to find children who really do need to be taken from dangerous homes.

Wrongful removal drives everything else. Nothing will change until Kansas faces up to it.”

Richard Wexler: Gilmore, auditors ignore real cause of Kansas foster care crisis [The Topeka Capital-Journal 8/4/16 by Richard Wexler]

REFORM Puzzle Piece

Accountability2

One Comment

  1. Another #PrivatizationFail.

    The problem is partly that privatized CPS systems have an incentive to take children into care, because they can then bill the taxpayers for them, unlike a public-run program with a fixed yearly budget. Businesses exist to make money; that’s why they shouldn’t be tasked with providing human services.

    Children should only be removed from their parents for actual abuse, not poverty or non-Middle Class parenting. If parents are doing something dumb like letting them ride in the back of a pickup truck, the first step should be to send a social worker out to do some parent education, rather than yanking the kids for something which used to be a normal fun childhood experience.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *