48 Hours Gives Expose on Congo Adoption UPDATED

By on 1-19-2014 in Celebrate Children International, Congo, Corruption

48 Hours Gives Expose on Congo Adoption UPDATED

Watch it here: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/perilous-journey/

It gives another good review of CCI  (Celebrate Children International).

 

REFORM Puzzle Piece

Corruption2

Update: Sue was interviewed.

“Celebrate Children International, the Oviedo adoption agency featured Saturday in CBS’ “48 Hours,” has ripped the report as “supermarket tabloidism.”

But the Florida Department of Children and Families has praised the hour as “very well done” and said it could raise awareness.

In a statement, CCI said: “It is sad and unfortunate that the network of Walter Cronkite has degraded into supermarket tabloidism. In its January 18 report on international adoptions, CBS News and ’48 Hours’ could have examined the deplorable and heartbreaking world of child trafficking and illegal adoption, a problem of global proportions.

“Instead, they chose to rely on opinion and innuendo in an effort to vilify CCI rather than relying on fact and research involving two families who succeeded in their international adoptions. Every action undertaken by CCI in those cases was entirely legal; investigations by the State of Florida found no merit to various complaints against CCI and no evidence of misconduct by CCI; and every single adoption was approved by the U.S. Department of State.”

The “48 Hours” report examined a lack of transparency in international adoptions and offered withering criticism of CCI, which is run by Sue Hedberg. One family complained that Hedberg had been negligent in hiring, spending their money and caring for their adopted daughters. Two families expressed concern that Hedberg didn’t know who she was dealing with on the ground in Guatemala and the Republic of Congo.

The hour also presented families praising Hedberg for her help, and correspondent Maureen Maher noted that Hedberg has never been charged “in any adoption case, and all of the adoptions she has completed were approved by U.S. embassies.”

But adoption consultant Duni Zenyae complained that Hedberg had turned a blind eye when going into countries where the adoption process is vulnerable.

And Carrie Proudfit of the Florida Department of Children and Families said in an email: “Celebrate Children International is no longer accepting new clients because of a federal law that went into effect recently, which requires international adoption agencies to earn a Hague Accreditation. CCI did not receive the necessary accreditation.”

The department helped CBS News on the “48 Hours” hour.

“Our hope is that the story, and others, provides awareness and education to prospective parents considering which path is best for them,” Proudfit said. “The path to an international adoption can be long, it can be costly, but of course the gift of a family cannot be measured, I encourage those parents out there considering any adoption to fully explore the history or background of any adoption agency the best that they can before deciding whether or not to select them.”

She added that “years of inquiries related to Celebrate Children International” have helped bring awareness to the state agency about whether everything is being done to ensure that the adoption process from another country helps a child.

In its statement, CCI said: “International adoption is a challenging and complex prospect for the families who pursue it and the agencies that assist with those adoptions. CCI has helped thousands of parents and children unite in loving, happy homes, and CCI’s high standards have prevented illegal or improper adoptions in the past.”

The agency added: “We are thankful to have helped so many children find permanent, loving families, and we enjoy having seen these children thrive over the past decade.””

Oviedo agency rips ’48 Hours’ for ‘supermarket tabloidism’ [Orlando Sentinel 1/20/14 by Hal Boedeker]

Update 2:”From CBS’ “48 Hours” this weekend: a repeat of a January 2014 story about an adoption agency in Oviedo.
Expect minor updates when the program airs at 9 p.m. Saturday on WKMG-Channel 6. A second hour, at 10 p.m. Saturday, focuses on the murder of a Colorado mother.

When the Oviedo story originally ran, I wrote:

Maureen Maher says it would be wrong to say her “48 Hours” report on international adoptions is a negative hour.

“There are happy endings in this hour,” she said. “The point of the story is to show there are parts of the industry that need to be fixed.”

The report examines how there is often a lack of transparency in international adoptions because of cultural differences and a lack of regulations, Maher said.

Both stories in Maher’s report involve Celebrate Children International, an adoption agency in Oviedo run by Sue Hedberg. Both families in those stories were concerned that Hedberg didn’t know who she was dealing with on the ground in Guatemala and the Republic of Congo, Maher said.
CCI said in a statement that it has “successfully completed thousands of adoptions to happy, loving families.”

The agency noted that it had not been allowed to review the program and could not speak to its content.

The CBS news magazine traveled with Hedberg to Ethiopia and Congo in April, Maher said, and the program features families who support her work, Maher said. But Hedberg later canceled an interview and has refused to talk to “48 Hours”; the program features a statement from CCI.

After the report first aired, I wrote this about the response:

Celebrate Children International, the Oviedo adoption agency featured Saturday in CBS’ “48 Hours,” has ripped the report as “supermarket tabloidism.”

But the Florida Department of Children and Families has praised the hour as “very well done” and said it could raise awareness.

In a statement, CCI said: “It is sad and unfortunate that the network of Walter Cronkite has degraded into supermarket tabloidism. In its January 18 report on international adoptions, CBS News and ’48 Hours’ could have examined the deplorable and heartbreaking world of child trafficking and illegal adoption, a problem of global proportions.

“Instead, they chose to rely on opinion and innuendo in an effort to vilify CCI rather than relying on fact and research involving two families who succeeded in their international adoptions.”

The “48 Hours” report examined a lack of transparency in international adoptions and offered withering criticism of CCI, which is run by Sue Hedberg. One family complained that Hedberg had been negligent in hiring, spending their money and caring for their adopted daughters.

The hour also presented families praising Hedberg for her help, and correspondent Maureen Maher noted that Hedberg has never been charged “in any adoption case, and all of the adoptions she has completed were approved by U.S. embassies.””

’48 Hours’ repeats Oviedo adoption story [Orlando Sentinel 9/4/15 by  Hal Boedeker]

 

7 Comments

  1. I watched it– I wouldn’t call their review of CCI “good”.

    I do think they gave the thesis “Sue Hedberg isn’t corrupt just incompetent” a little too much credit. Hedberg is heard on videotape saying that kidnapped child Maria Fernanda was “going to Tennessee.” Thus when Sue Hedberg later claims that she never offered the child for adoption this was a “provably false statement.”

    I also think the Owens should have independently verified that “Ava” and “Zoe” were actually free for adoption, given the discrepancies that THEY noted in the girls’ background. For all they know, loving parents dropped the sisters off for temporary care at the first orphanage, and they were whisked away to the second orphanage to “launder” them for lucrative international adoption.

    Personal pet peeve here— what’s the deal with adoptive parents unilaterally renaming kids without consulting the children involved? Three and six-year-olds know their own names: They shouldn’t be arbitrarily stripped of them without consent.

  2. Would you believe me if I told you that the parents commenting (commenting in the private facebook group) about last night’s 48 Hours are seeing it as positive because it didn’t go after Congolese adoptions directly but was more anti-CCI? A lot of these parents are just being willfully ignorant.

    • if there were any scientific validity to tossing Sue into a body of water and then burning her at the stake for witchcraft, I might suggest it.

      CCI would be an excellent plot line for next season’s American Horror Story but I like Jessica Lange too much to cast her as the evil child trafficker character.

      * heavy sarcasm used in the creation of this message. This blog will be inundated with CCI clients in short order*

  3. What was really, really scary about that 48 hrs episode (besides the evil incarnate that is Sue Hedberg/CCI) was that the US family in the final stages of adopting 2 Congolese girls via CCI:
    1) acknowledged CCI/Sue had misled and outright lied to them
    2) acknowledged that there was a TON of child trafficking going on in DRC that they personally witnessed
    3) acknowledged that the orphanage the 2 girls were living in didnt want to release them because the director had concerns regarding whether the girls had been voluntarily relinquished / were genuinely in need of foreign parents
    4) merrily grabbed both girls, their exit visas and happily set aside ALL moral/ethical concerns in their sheet GLEE to get both possibly trafficked kids to the US!!!

    Last but not least, 48 Hours did not bother to interview a SINGLE adult international adoptee — not one!!!!

    • If you noticed, they also didn’t say HOW that family got their exit visas so quickly – in DRC, that usually means there was some sort of bribery involved at the DGM.

    • Carlee,

      I agree adult adoptees should have been interviewed. Why are THEY never, ever, asked for their opinion on shows discussing the issues of adoption– international or domestic, infant or older child?

      In fairness, it was Sue Hedberg Elizabeth refused to relinquish the seven transferred kids to– because they told her that they were being abused in Hedberg’s orphanage. They were provably being neglected, as the condition of the poor children’s feet showed.

      That’s why Hedberg sent the kids to Elizabeth in the first place– she thought letting PAPs see their worm-infected feet would be bad PR. But once the kids were restored to saleable condition, she wanted her “merchandise” back.

      Did you see the look of shock on Hedberg’s face when the police refused to make Elizabeth restore her “property” to her?

      I remember that the wording indicated that Elizabeth thought SOME of the children sent to her by Sue Hedberg weren’t truly relinquished, but I don’t recall that she mentions Ava and Zoe specifically. Since Elizabeth was helping the Owens complete to adoption after they lost faith in Hedberg, it implies that she thought their two girls were free for adoption.

      Maybe. She may have thought the chances of finding the girls’ birth family and confirming they were free for adoption so slim that supporting the adoption by the Owens the lesser of two evils.

  4. Sue Hedberg on 48 Hours was a trip down memory lane but in a good way this time. I was gratified to see Mildred and Betsy hugging each other in Guatemala.

    I’m also gratified to hear that a new law will require US agencies to be Hague Accredited which Sue has failed to do twice. Not that COA accreditation is a gold standard of quality in adoptionland.

    I wasn’t surprised by the Congolese PAPs fundraising sixty grand either. The extralegal measures they took were standard operating procedure in Guatemala before it closed for adoption. C’mon, the PAPs contracted with CCI in 2011 well after Sue’s clients exposed her online and these PAPs didn’t even google the agency name or Sue’s? I don’t understand the enchantment PAPs seem to have with agencies with bad track records.

    If this isn’t a lead in bloggers doing the ABCs of agency due diligence, I don’t know what will wake up PAPs.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.