“Independent” Adoptions Caused Abuses and Deaths of Russian Adoptees?

By on 7-19-2011 in Adoption Agencies, International Adoption, Russia, US

“Independent” Adoptions Caused Abuses and Deaths of Russian Adoptees?

Many articles have been published about the new Russian-US agreement on international adoptions. The adoption industry is sopping up the limelight while trying to pass the buck on the cause of all of the Russian concerns. They are trying to place the blame of past Russian adoptee abuses on “independent” adoptions. Of course that runs counter to the most quoted story — the Torry Hansen debacle — the woman who placed her child back on a plane to Russia last year. She used the Hague-accredited, Russia-permitted agency WACAP. Hardly an independent adoption.


This Ukrainian article about the Russian/US Adoption agreement quotes
“Chuck Johnson, chief executive of the National Council for Adoption, said many of the cases of abuse involved Russian children who were adopted independently, rather than through U.S. adoption agencies accredited by Russian authorities.”

NPR interviews David Crary in this article which states the following:

“NORRIS [interviewer]: Now we’ve been mentioning agencies. Sometimes they are independent operators that don’t necessarily work through an agency that help facilitate adoptions. How would the rules change for them?

Mr. CRARY: Well, you touched on a key point in this whole agreement. A lot of the troublesome adoptions that have been coming from Russia in the past were arranged by these independent brokers. Those are going to be completely prohibited under this new agreement. All of the adoptions will need to be done through authorized agencies.”

Meaning of “Independent”

So what do they mean when they say INDEPENDENT and what are they trying to imply? There are state-licensed agencies, Hague-accredited agencies and agencies given permits to operate in Russia by Russia. Prior to this agreement, there were also people who just had a homestudy and use facilitators or non-permitted “partner” agencies to adopt from Russia. A list of agencies can be found here .  Many agencies that are either state-licensed or both state –licensed and Hague-approved “partner” with the Russian-permitted agencies. Many more agencies are Hague-accredited than Russian-permit-approved.

The NCFA  spokesman, Chuck Johnson, is implying that “independent” means non-Russian-permitted agencies. Perhaps the argument is that the non-permitted agencies are somehow less than the permitted ones in quality. Yet many of the non-permitted agencies are Hague-approved and are members of his adoption agency group or JCICS. This is purely a diversionary tactic. They want the general public to believe that something has been done to clean up the process. Sorry, but if the non-permitted agencies are Hague-approved, they should be acting ethically even if they are merely “independent brokers” in Russia.

The NPR interview seems to imply that “independent” adoptions are those that do not use partner agencies and instead use facilitators.

The REAL Issues on the US Side

US agency approvals by states and Hague are clearly inadequate. Additionally, all international adoptions have to have approved homestudies. If an emphasis is trying to be placed on a large gap in safeguards, then the case of inadequate homestudies and rubberstamping needs to be made. The real catch should be the HOMESTUDY. And not just for the adults in the home, but to assess the other children in the home (see #11 of Abuse cases below).

With PoundPup Legacy and Daily Bastardette databases and searches, we decided to try to confirm or deny this CLAIM that it is those “independently brokered” adoptions that were involved in the abused Russian adoptees or had children die in their care.

So here are the cases of abuse or death of Russian adoptees that we have compiled.

Abuse Cases

  1. 2 Children adopted by Theresa and Reed Hansen/Utah
    Unknown if agency or independent
  2. Kristoff Beagley/Alaska
    REFORM Talk coverage
    Alaska International Agency
    Currently In Business
    Currently In Process of Hague Reaccreditation
    Russia Permitted
  3. Girl (now 5) adopted by Theresa McNulty/Pennsylvania
    Unknown if agency or independent
    Other information: Trial pending
  4. Three girls adopted by Edelwina and Steven Leschinsky /Colorado
    REFORM Talk Coverage
    Littlest Angels Agency
    Currently in business
    Currently Hague-approved for homestudy only
    Not Russia Permitted
  5. Six adopted children from Russia/Lapeer County Michigan
    Unknown if agency or independent
    Other information: No media reports since 2008
  6. 9-year-old girl adopted by David Charles Gilmore/Oregon
    Unknown if agency or independent
    Other information: convicted of sex abuse, serving 19 years.
  7. 4-year-old boy from Taganrog, Rostov, Russia, adopted by Jane and Timothy Cochran/New York
    Media reports say used accredited agency/agency name withheld
  8. 11 Children adopted by Tom and Debra Schmitz/Tennessee
    Some from Russia From disruptions/unknown if agency or independent for original or disrupted adoption
  9. Masha Allen/Pennsylvania FTIA
    Currently in Business
    Currently JCICS member
    Currently Hague-approved
    Currently Russia-Permitted
  10. Marian and John DiMarias’ special needs/deaf girls/eventually Vermont, formerly of New York, Kentucky Only some of the 21 were from Russia
    Unknown if agency or independent
    Other information: John convicted of sexually abusing older girls; in jail since 2003
  11. David and Holly Meyers 4 year old girl adopted as an infant in Russia/Michigan Unknown if agency or independent
    Other information: victim of adopted-sibling abuse; sibling adopted from Romania from agency not Hague accredited
  12. Twenty six month old Kelsey Hyre/Ohio
    Agency reported as either or both: A Child’s Waiting or BBAS
    A Child’s waiting is out of business
    BBAS is in business, not Hague-accredited or Russia-permitted
    BBAS is current NCFA member
  13. 2 Girls adopted by Karen and Richard Thorne/Arizona
    Hand in Hand
    Currently in Business
    Currently Hague-Accredited
    Currently Russia-permitted
  14. Xenia was originally adopted by Marta-Annette Blanford, then disrupted and adopted by Michael Grismore/Georgia Independent Adoption

Summary: Six of fourteen cases used an agency; one definitely was an independent adoption; the rest of the cases are unknown if an agency was used. Of those that used agencies, three of six were Russia-permitted; two are Hague-accredited; one in process of re-accreditation; one is unknown; two are not Hague-accredited. So looking at abuse only cases, perhaps the qualification that- most were “independent-brokered” is not too far off if you assume all unknown cases are independent or non-permitted or if Mr. Johnson is privately aware of many other abuse cases that were not reported in the media. Since half of the agency-led adoptions were Russia-permitted and half were not, it does not appear that the Russia-permitted agencies have any additional safeguards, though.

Now let’s look at the irreversible result of abuse and neglect cases..the death cases…

Death Cases

  1. Nathaniel Craver /Pennsylvania
    REFORM Talk coverage
    Lutheran Services of the South
    Currently in Business
    Currently JCICS member
    Currently NCFA member
    Currently Hague-Accredited
    Not Russia-Permitted
  2. Chase Harrison/Virginia EAC
    Currently in Business
    Currently JCICS member
    Currenty NCFA member
    Currently Hague-Accredited
    Currently Russia-permitted
  3. Nicolai Emelyantsev/Utah
    About A Child through Reece’s Rainbow
    Currently in Business
    Currently Hague-Accredited
    Not Russia-permitted
    Reece’s Rainbow current JCICS member
  4. Isaac Jonathan Dykstra/Iowa
    Unknown if agency or independent
  5. Nina Hilt/North Carolina
    Adoptions International
    Currently in Business
    Not Hague-accredited
    Not Russia-permitted
  6. Dennis Gene Merryman/Maryland
    Adoptions Forever
    Currently in Business
    Not Hague-accredited
    Not Russia-permitted
  7. Alex Pavlis/Illinois
    Yunona
    Facilitators = independent
    Out of Business
  8. Liam Thompson/Ohio
    AMREX and Tree of Life
    AMREX out of business-facilitated 54 agencies (see here for the list)
    Tree of Life currently in Business
    Tree of Life Currently Hague-accredited
    Tree of Life not Russia-permitted
  9. Jessica Albina Hagmann/Virginia
    Agency used; not specified
  10. Maria Anastasia Bennett/Utah
    Focus on Children
    Not in Business
    Hague-Denied
    Not Russia-permitted
  11. Yana and Anatoli Kolenda/Massachusetts
    Unknown if independent or agency
    Adoptive father stabbed them and his wife to death before fatally shooting himself
  12. Zachary Higier/Massachusetts
    Frank Adoption Center
    Currently in Business
    Currently Hague-accredited
    Currently Russia-permitted
  13. Jacob Lindorff/New Jersey
    An Open Door Adoption Agency
    Currently in Business
    Currently JCICS member
    Currently Hague-Accredited
    Not Russian-Permitted
  14. Luke Evans/Indiana
    Small World Charity, Inc of NYC
    Not in business
    Not Hague-accredited
    Not Russia-permitted
  15. Viktor Matthey/New Jersey
    Homestudy and postplacement Bethany
    Placement AMREX and Adoption Alliance
    Bethany currently in business
    Bethany current JCICS member
    Bethany current NCFA member
    Bethany currently Hague-accredited
    Bethany Not Russia-permitted
    AMREX facilitators out of business
    Adoption Alliance currently in business
    Adoption Alliance Hague-accredited
    Adoption Alliance Russia-permitted
  16. Logan Higginbotham/Vermont
    EAC
    Currently in business
    Currently JCICS member
    Currently NCFA member
    Currently Hague-Accredited
    Currently Russia-permitted
  17. David Polreis/Colorado
    Rainbow House International
    Currently in Business
    Not Hague-accredited
    Not Russia-permitted

Of the seventeen cases (eighteen deaths due to the sibling group), fourteen adoptions were agency-arranged; two were unknown; one through Yunona (facilitators). The two AMREX cases used currently-Hague accredited agencies and one of those is currently Russian-permitted, so any way you cut it almost all of death cases were handled by agencies. Eight of the cases are by Hague-accredited agencies. Four of the known ones are currently Russian-accredited.

Will narrowing the allowed agencies to Russian-permitted ones reduce the risk of adoptee abuse and death? Maybe, but the best way is to weed out prospective parents in the homestudy process. There are no standards for training social workers for homestudies and the bureaucratic checks of the process clearly are not adequate.

Overall, though most of the abuse and death cases occurred in cases where agencies did not have Russian Permits, many of these agencies are Hague-accredited and only three are out of business. So I guess if these statistics help Chuck Johnson sleep at night, congratulations. This only re-emphasizes the poor Hague accreditation process for agencies in the US. Looking at international adoptions overall, the majority of international adoptions are not done under Hague regulations, anyway. It is still the Wild West.

REFORM Puzzle Piece

Corruption2

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *