How Could You? Hall of Shame -Zoraida Figueroa-Norse UPDATED

By on 10-28-2011 in Abuse in foster care, How could you? Hall of Shame, New York, Vermont, Zoraida Figueroa-Norse

How Could You? Hall of Shame -Zoraida Figueroa-Norse UPDATED

This will be an archive of heinous actions by those involved in child welfare, foster care and adoption. We forewarn you that these are deeply disturbing stories that may involve sex abuse, murder, kidnapping and other horrendous actions.

From Watertown, New York, after a mistrial was declared on September13, 2011 due to an insufficient number of potential jurors showing up smiley icons, 35-year-old foster mother Zoraida Figueroa-Norse is finally “on trial for allegedly severely beating her 8-year-old foster daughter on June 26, 2010, but her attorneys contend that it was her brother, Darren L. Moore, who inflicted the injuries.

The child was injured at Mr. Moore’s home at 17575 County Route 63 in the town of Hounsfield. Ms. Figueroa-Norse was staying at the residence while she moved her mother from a Mannsville residence to Vermont, where Ms. Figueroa-Norse also lives.”

“The child suffered head trauma that caused bleeding and swelling on her brain, as well as bruised internal organs in her abdominal area. Dr. Robert Kanter, who has worked in the pediatric intensive care unit at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, since 1980, testified Tuesday that the injuries were caused by an “exceedingly violent traumatic event.” He said absent any other explanation, such as the child had been involved in a serious accident, he had to reason the injuries were the result of child abuse.

“Among all of the cases I’ve seen in 31 years, this was one of the severest combinations of traumatic and life-threatening injuries I’ve seen,” Dr. Kanter said. “This was certainly life-threatening. This was a very severe brain injury.”

The child spent more than a month in coma and nearly a year in a rehabilitation center, a case worker with the Vermont Department for Children and Families testified Wednesday. The child still has long- and short-term memory impairment, trouble walking and recently had a synthetic plate placed in her head to replace portions of her skull removed to relieve the brain swelling.

Mr. Moore claims that Ms. Figueroa-Norse was trying to discipline the child, who has behavioral problems, by making her wash dishes. He said at one point, Ms. Figueroa-Norse and the child became involved in “a pretty serious incident” at the kitchen sink, with Ms. Figueroa-Norse striking the child several times in the head and the child fighting back. During the exchange, the child hit her chin on the kitchen sink and had a bloody nose, he said. ”

“After the incident, the child ran from the house to the edge of the road. Ms. Figueroa-Norse retrieved her and carried her back to the house, with Mr. Moore holding the door for her. Ms. Figueroa-Norse then allegedly took the child to the basement for a “time-out.” When she emerged, she called out to Moore that she was returning to her mother’s and to leave the child in the basement. After a period, he went to check on the child and found her unresponsive, according to his testimony.

“Honestly, I thought she was sleeping,” Mr. Moore said.

He carried her upstairs to a bed and called Ms. Figueroa-Norse to tell her “Rachel wasn’t moving,” but claims he was told “she was faking it.” He said the child had scratches on her face, but no bruising and, because his sister was on her way back, he did not seek medical attention.

“Zoraida comes back and says, “Where’s Rachel?” Mr. Moore said. “She looks at Rachel and tells her to quit faking it. Then she grabs Rachel, and realizes, and starts freaking out.”

He said before his sister took the child to Samaritan Medical Center, Ms. Figueroa-Norse told him that if anyone asked, he was to tell them that she had dropped the child onto her head on concrete as she carried her back into the house earlier, even though Mr. Moore said he never saw the child being dropped. That became the version he gave to police in two statements and to a grand jury investigating the matter.”

“He said he never gave prosecutors an accurate account of the events until about a month ago, after realizing that Ms. Figueroa-Norse was not going to assist him in Family Court in regaining custody of his son. In the aftermath of the injuries to Rachel, the Department of Social Services had removed Mr. Moore’s child, citing his failure to protect Ms. Figueroa-Norse’s child.

“She felt horrible, she cried and said she was going to go to court with us and tell them we didn’t have anything to do with this,” Mr. Moore said.

Instead, he claims, his sister did not appear in court and began to suggest that he was responsible for the child’s injuries.

“Her attorney told her it was her word against mine,” he said.

Ms. Figueroa-Norse’s attorney, David P. Antonucci, Watertown, attempted to impugn Mr. Moore’s reputation, asking questions about a criminal record that includes arrests for a domestic violence incident and a sale of cocaine. Mr. Antonucci questioned why Mr. Moore had given false statements to police and also told police, “My sister would never hit that kid.”

“Why did you lie? Why did you perjure yourself?” Mr. Antonucci said.

Mr. Moore said he gave the false statements because he still believed his sister was going to help him in his custody battle. Mr. Moore regained custody of his son earlier this month.

“Do you have any reason to come forward today at this trial and accuse your sister if this wasn’t true?” Assistant District Attorney Aaron D. Carr said.

“No,” Mr. Moore said.

Testimony in the trial is scheduled to enter its fourth day today.”

Adams Center man testifies his sister, not him, severely beat foster child
[Watertown Daily Times 10/27/11 by Brian Kelly]

“Jefferson County sheriff’s detectives investigated the alleged beating of an 8-year-old as a possible murder, according to testimony Thursday in Jefferson County Court.

Detective Paige C. Taylor testified at the trial of Zoraida Y. Figueroa-Norse that, based on the prognosis of the child’s condition, “we were unsure” if the child would survive.”

“Detective Taylor, who was a deputy at the time of the incident, testified that she interviewed Ms. Figueroa-Norse for about 10 hours at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, where the child had been transferred from Samaritan Medical Center. She said the interview eventually was reduced to a 20-page handwritten statement in which Ms. Figueroa-Norse said the injuries had occurred during a fall while she was carrying the child.”

““She said that Rachel had flopped backwards from her arms and she had dropped her in the driveway,” Detective Taylor said.

A doctor who treated the child at the Syracuse hospital earlier testified that the injuries could not have occurred from a fall from such a height. He said the injuries were more consistent with a fall from at least a second-story window. The child suffered bleeding on her brain and internal organ damage in her abdomen. She spent a month in a coma and nearly a year in a physical rehabilitation center and has not fully recovered from the injuries.”

“The prosecution is expected to rest this morning, with defense witnesses called in the afternoon.”
Detectives investigated foster child’s alleged beating in Adams Center as possible murder
[Watertown Daily Times 10/28/11 by Brian Kelly]

Previous Articles

” A state budget mandate may have contributed to a mistrial being declared Monday in Jefferson County Court.

There were not enough potential jurors deemed qualified to sit for the trial of Zoraida Y. Figueroa-Norse, a Vermont woman who faces a second-degree assault charge for allegedly seriously injuring her 8-year-old foster child in June 2010, prompting Judge Kim H. Martusewicz to declare the mistrial.

Veteran court employees said typically when the matter to be tried is serious, about 100 potential jurors are brought in for screening in an attempt to whittle the pool to 12 jurors and one or two alternates. But the state Office of Court Administration has ordered that smaller pools be called to save money after the office’s budget was cut by $70 million this year. For Monday’s trial, 62 jurors were called, but only 49 showed up. Six jurors were dismissed for legitimate personal reasons, leaving a pool of 43 people.

Before a jury is selected, prosecutors and defense attorneys question potential jurors and, along with the judge, have the right to strike any from the pool if they deem the juror unfit to serve or believe the person cannot remain unbiased.

Under questioning Monday by Assistant District Attorney Aaron D. Carr and defense attorney David P. Antonucci, several jurors said they would have a problem sitting on the jury because of the sensitive nature of the allegations. Many others admitted they would find a police officer’s or social worker’s testimony more credible than the average person owing to the training those positions entail, raising the possibility that the juror could be prejudiced in favor of the prosecution’s witnesses.

After the first half of the jury pool was questioned, eight jurors were chosen. When only two jurors were deemed qualified to serve from the second half, Judge Martusewicz announced the postponement of the trial as there were no other potential jurors available.

“There was no gamesmanship on anyone’s part,” Mr. Antonucci said. “They were knocked off for cause.”

Mr. Antonucci, who along with attorney J. R. Carter from his office spent weeks preparing Ms. Figueroa-Norse’s defense, and had a witness due to fly in later this week from Puerto Rico. That witness, along with others for the defense, as well as those for the prosecution, will have to be issued new subpoenas to appear when the trial is rescheduled, tentatively set for the last week in October.

“It’s a logistical nightmare for the D.A.’s office, but we’re committed to going forward,” Mr. Carr said.”

Mistrial declared in alleged child assault case
[Watertown Daily Times 9/13/11 by Brian Kelly]

“A Vermont woman accused of seriously injuring her foster child in the town of Hounsfield wants to prevent a 20-page statement she gave to police from being used against her at trial.

Zoraida Y. Figueroa-Norse, 33, Bristol, Vt., was indicted in December on charges of second-degree assault and endangering the welfare of a child for allegedly causing brain and abdominal injuries to an 8-year-old girl whom she planned to adopt.”

“During an evidence suppression hearing Monday in Jefferson County Court, questions were raised about whether Ms. Figueroa-Norse believed she was in police custody when she provided a statement June 26 to sheriff’s Deputy Paige C. Taylor at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse.

Deputy Taylor testified that while she interviewed Ms. Figueroa-Norse for more than five hours, both in a waiting room and in a conference room, Ms. Figueroa-Norse never was told she was not free to leave. The deputy said Ms. Figueroa-Norse was allowed to go to her car and other places within the hospital unescorted.

Under examination by her attorney, J.R. Carter, Watertown, Ms. Figueroa-Norse agreed that she was never told she could not leave nor was she intimidated by Deputy Taylor, but said she complied with the deputy’s questioning out of a respect for law enforcement.

She also claims the deputy made assurances to her that if she completed the interview, the officer would arrange to have Ms. Figueroa-Norse meet with her daughter’s surgeon. When the interview was completed, she testified, she got no response when she asked about the meeting with doctors.

“She just escorted me out of the hospital; there wasn’t really an answer,” she said.

Deputy Taylor testified that “I promised her nothing” and that Ms. Figueroa-Norse was not considered a suspect, or at least the lone suspect, at the time of the interview. She said she interviewed her again June 27 at the Metro-Jefferson Public Safety Building, again voluntarily.

However, Ms. Figueroa-Norse testified that the interview took on a much more interrogatory tone than the one in Syracuse because of the presence of Deputy Taylor’s supervisor, Sgt. Todd L. O’Brien. In the midst of that interview, she asked for an attorney and the questioning ended.

“I believe the sergeant just slammed his hand on the table and said that I had beat (the child),” she said.

In the statement at issue, Ms. Figueroa-Norse made no admission as to causing any of the child’s injuries, according to testimony. Deputy Taylor said Ms. Figueroa-Norse described her foster daughter as a “challenging child” and said she was prone to “self-inflicted” injuries.

It was during an outburst when the child had run from the house and across a road that the child was injured, according to testimony. Ms. Figueroa-Norse told Deputy Taylor that after the child had been caught in a field, the girl was struggling and fell from Ms. Figueroa-Norse’s arms onto a driveway, causing the injuries.

Judge Kim H. Martusewicz reserved decision on whether the statement can be used at trial. Ms. Figueroa-Norse remains free on bail.”
Suspect wants her comments suppressed
[Watertown Daily Times 4/19/11 by Brian Kelly]

She was jailed under $75,000 bail.

Police: Vermont woman beat foster child during Jefferson County visit
[Watertown Daily Times 7/2/10 by Dave Shampine]

Update: “A Jefferson County Court jury will begin deliberations this morning to determine whether a Vermont woman seriously injured her foster child by beating her, or whether her brother committed the act, as her defense attorneys contend.

Zoraida Y. Figueroa-Norse, 34, Bristol, Vt., has been on trial for six days facing a second-degree assault charge for allegedly severely beating her 8-year-old foster child June 26, 2010, while in Jefferson County to move her mother from near Mannsville to Vermont.”

“The injuries occurred at the home of her brother, Darren L. Moore, at 17575 County Route 63, town of Hounsfield. Ms. Figueroa-Norse’s lead attorney, David P. Antonucci, Watertown, has repeatedly fingered Mr. Moore as the abuser and did so again during his closing argument Monday.

Mr. Antonucci claims that Mr. Moore provided several contradictory versions of events and that his motivation to lie about the incident was “saving his own skin.” Mr. Antonucci pointed to a statement Mr. Moore gave police indicating that if his own son displayed the type of behavior the foster child exhibited, he would beat the boy.

That’s his thought pattern: when kids are bad you beat the hell out of them,” Mr. Antonucci said.

Assistant District Attorney Aaron D. Carr said that the expressions about beatings were merely an attempt to minimize what his sister had done and that the contradictory statements he gave police were designed to protect her. He said Mr. Moore was never charged in the investigation and has been promised no immunity from prosecution for his later admissions that he had provided false statements to investigators, but has now provided the one “true” statement in the case.

“He had absolutely no reason to come forward with this information,” Mr. Carr said.

Before closing statements, the jury heard from Mr. Moore’s and Ms. Figueroa-Norse’s mother, Nydia Jack, who was with the pair when the decision was made to take the child to the hospital.

Ms. Jack, who was subpoenaed from her current home in Puerto Rico as a defense witness, testified that she never asked either of her children how the injuries were caused.

“I don’t know what happened to Raychel,” she said.

She contradicted Ms. Figueroa-Norse’s earlier testimony that she and Mr. Moore conspired to blame Ms. Figueroa-Norse for the beating and that the pair had refused to give her a telephone when she wanted to call for emergency help for the child.

“Why would I tear my family apart like that?” Ms. Jack said.

The jury will be given its instructions by Judge Kim H. Martusewicz this morning and then will be given the case for deliberation.”

Jury to begin deliberations in Adams Center foster child abuse case
[Watertown Daily Times 11/1/11 by Brian Kelly]

“A Jefferson County jury has found a Vermont woman guilty in connection to an assault on her foster child. Thirty four year old Zoraida Figueroa-Norse was found guilty on charges of second degree assault and endangering the welfare of a child, concluding a trial that lasted approximately one week. Figueroa-Norse stood accused of assaulting her eight year old Foster child at the home of her brother in the Town of Hounsfield back in 2010. Her lawyer tried to point the finger at the brother, Darren Moore, during the trial. She faces up to seven years in prison when sentenced in January.”

Woman convicted of assault on foster child
[ABC 50 11/2/11]

Update 2: Hat tip to our readers who let us know of the verdict.

“A Vermont woman convicted last year of assault on an eight year old foster girl in her care will spend the next four years in prison.

Zoraida Figueroa-Norse was also sentenced to a concurrent one year sentence on a charge of endangering the welfare of a child.

Upon her release, she will be on probation for three years.

Figueroa-Norse was arrested in June 2010 after the child was hospitalized with serious head and abdominal injuries.”
Woman Sentenced For Assaulting Child
[WWNYTV 1/17/12]

REFORM Puzzle Piece

Homestudy2

15 Comments

  1. My name is Amanda Kemp and I am the biological mother to the child that was almost murdered by this woman in NY. It greatly disturbs me to know that my children were removed from my home due to abuse from their step father; not from myself and they were placed in the care of this woman. The state of VT had all parties involved with my children including myself that she was the best person to care for my baby girl and make sure that she would never know abuse from another adult. I thought my daughter was safe because the state of VT said to trust them…that they were 100% sure this woman was okay and would never harm my child. As a result of VT Department of Children and Families, my daughter will forever be affected by this ordeal that no person especially a child should ever have to endure in any lifetime. When i first heard from my mother about what had happened my first instinct was to find this woman and make her suffer the same abuse and neglect that she had made my daughter suffer but then realized that wasnt good enough for the crime that she had committed. I just got word today that she has been convicted of her terrible crime and is facing 7 yrs in prison. Although i am happy to hear of the conviction, i am not satisfied with the charge she was convicted of. My baby girl had a 10% chance of survival when she arrived at the hospital due to extent of her injuries that this woman inflicted upon her. I feel that she should have recieved an Attempted Murder conviction and nothing less than that because my daughter came closer than any child should come to losing their life. Raychel will never again be able to be the girl she was before this happened to her and will have life long affects to her abdomen and brain as a result of these injuries. Sure she is alive and will still be able to live a fullfilling life but not as great as it could have been before. I can only sit here and hope and pray to god that the judge who hands down this womans sentencing makes sure that she serves the maximum number of years allowed by law and doesnt allow her to get parole before her maximum sentence has been fulfilled in jail. I also would hope that this woman is now and forever forbidden to be around any child including her own without supervision. If it was myself…she would never would be allowed to see her own kids even if it was supervised due to the fact that she doesnt deserve the title as a mother and almost took my daughter away from me for the rest of my life. There isnt any amount of years you could give this woman that makes what she did justified and i just hope they give her the max possible by law. This woman is a disgrace to all real mothers and foster mothers and is a perfect example of why us real mothers that struggle each and every day to care for our children and yet have them taken from us at no fault of our own worry about when our babies are placed in states custody!!! So in a nutshell…YAY to the conviction and NAY to the actual charge she was given!!! Sorry state of NY but in my mind and the minds of many of my family members…its NOT GOOD ENOUGH!

  2. We are so sorry to hear about your daughter's condition. We agree that the charge and possible maximum sentence of 7 years is not enough. We hope that the state will pay for her care. This is a grave injustice. Zoraida never should have been approved to be a foster parent.

  3. Today, she was sentenced to ONLY 4 years in prison. While the little girl will suffer for her entire life.

  4. Really, do you know all the facts? As a biological mother were you there for anything? Nope not even the criminal proceedings! People piss and moan about the foster care system, but it's a good thing that the foster parents are there to pick up the pieces! Kids are not just taken away and never given back, it is up to the parent to make life better for the child, and when they fail to do that the kids do not return home! Life is not easy for anyone involved in this case! Why wish that type of pain and suffering onto anyone's child? Mental abuse is just as bad as physical abuse. No child should have to suffer! Why don't you ask her brother Darin where he was in this? Would you leave a child UN-supervised for that period of time, or if you had found a child in attention of medical need would you just leave her or would you get HELP immediately? What about the Grandmother where was she? Tell the facts! I think of Raychel every day and hope that she can recover!

  5. Amanda~
    You're leaving out some critical facts about why your kids were taken from you. The man you were with molested all three of your kids. Even after you discovered this, you stayed with him. That is why you still do not have custody of your kids. For you to post on here when you should be in this "Hall of Shame," is a mockery of this whole site.
    While Zoraida was found guilty, her appeal will be heard and if the court system is just, it will be granted. There was a witness who saw Zoraida's brother HIT Raychel with whiffle ball bat, but that wasn't admitted because the witness died before they finally got to the trial. All the facts were not heard, and someday they will be. I'm wondering how many other people on this site were eventually proven innocent? After having witnessed this whole situation I know not to immediately jump to the conclusion of guilty when I hear on the news of people being charged of crimes. ALL the evidence was circumstantial, doesn't that say something?

    • Thats a lie he only molested one of them. I should know. I am Amanda’s first born. Cayce. He molested me not Raychel or Dilyan.

  6. Anonymous, why do you feel it is necessary to get into the children's pasts to prove some point about Zoraida? Secondly, how many were proven innocent in our archive? None.But there are a lot of abused and DEAD children. There is no "proven innocent". You are charged with a crime and either guilty or not guilty. This case is here because of *the child* who was a victim. You have lost sight of the twice-victimized child. A child should NEVER have to endure severe head trauma, let alone from a SUPPOSEDLY screened foster mother.It wasn't a safe placement. It should never have happened.

  7. Rally~

    In response, you are right, it is about the children. Many of us pray daily for Raychel, and miss having her bright laughter around, including Zoraida's children and fiance. But what about Zoraida's children? The youngest daughter was present when Raychel was hurt, and still to this day is incredibly confused as to why her mother is being punished for something her uncle did (HER WORDS). All three of Zoraida's daughters have been affected drastically by this whole case as they have been unable to spend as much time with their mother as they normally would, none now. While I understand why this site exists, I do not agree with the tactics of attacking people that others know nothing about. Unfortunately we no longer live in a country where the justice system is always right, but rather in a country where the justice system feels the need to find someone guilty when the public is outraged, whether they have enough or accurate evidence to do so. Innocent people are sent to jail every day, and I can promise you that if you knew Zoraida, you would have a better understanding of this. I was present at this trial, I have read the transcripts, they had no REAL evidence supporting their theory that Zoraida was the one who hurt Raychel. What they did have was a witness who saw her brother beating Raychel, numerous statements from her brother that if Raychel had been his, he would have beaten her regularly, tapes of him attempting to bribe the police… yet, they pursued Zoraida. Daren Moore, Zoraida's brother, was and is a well connected druggie and gambler… Amazing how Watertown made a record number of drug related arrests the week after Zoraida's conviction, isn't it?
    I can plead for you to believe in Zoraida, but I know that until all the facts are released and brought up during her appeal, people will believe what they will. It is not your site that bothers me, it is the comments from people who do not know all the details that do. All I ask is that if Zoraida is found innocent, will that be posted? Or will Zoraida continue to be vilified?

  8. Anonymous, we are not attacking or villifying anyone. Wew were not on the jury. We are sharing the public information.She was convicted and sentenced. That is a fact.As for other commenters, it is a he said she said. We will update the case if anything further comes from it.

  9. Ya know what the woman that lost the child in question lost her for a reason. so mama or what ever you wanna call yerself you are no mother if ya screwed up bad enough to lose her. I know the woman that was convicted of the assault on the lil girl. She is not the monster she is painted to be. She is not and never has been violent with a child or any other person.

  10. casola,your comments are really uncalled for. It is not the biological mother's fault that her child was injured by agovernment-appointed parent who decided to give a 20 page statement to police on the events that occurred during Raychel's injury. Zoraida had no business being a foster parent.

  11. What I am saying is how dare she judge anyone when she wasnt even mother enough to keep her daughter. And say what you will you do not know the accused I do and she did not harm that child. We all know how the legal system likes to twist words that leave a persons mouth. A person has to go through alot just to be a foster parent so she had to qualify so say what ya will she did have business being a foster parent. A biloigical parent must do some really horrible stuff to lose her child to the system thats a fact as well isnt it Rally. You wanna sit back and put facts out there thats a fact isnt it?
    I would say it is a biological parents fault if their child leaves their care and ends up in a bad situation wouldnt you. We bring children into this world its our job to parent and protect.

  12. Nuncasola, why do you think she has no right to judge? That makes no sense. Do YOU know that there was an appropriate removal of the child from her biological mother to begin with? The same thing you are accusing me of could be said for her situation. A biological parent does NOT necessarily have to do anything to lose their child to the US foster care system. 2/3s of cases are neglect and that is why 4/5s of children are not available for adoption from foster care. Only 1/3 of cases are due to abuses. Many cases are due to issues with noncustodial adults (boyfriend) and not with the parent.So, no your statement is NOT a "fact."

    I vehemently disagree that it is the biological parent's fault if their child is abused in the foster care system! Is it the biological parent's fault if their child is abused at a public school, too? You must work for the government to defend it so strongly.

  13. One question for the biological mother: After finding out what happened with the boyfriend and your children, why didn’t you leave the bast@%&?? That is the REAL reason the child was never able to be put back in your custody.You want to make yourself out to be an innocent “victim” in this, but honestly, how COULD a parent NOT leave a SOB that does that to your child? As for Zoriada, I feel she got the short end of the stick here. She didn’t do this..her brother did. Its sad to see so many suffering needlessly.

  14. Name,

    Re: “…why didn’t you leave the bast@%&??…”

    Maybe because the bast@%& wouldn’t listen to her when she told him to leave. After all, if he respected her boundaries, he wouldn’t be an abuser to begin with!

    Or maybe he told her that he’d kill her and the kids, too if she tried to leave– a threat that too many abusers follow through on. Or perhaps it was because she had no place to go where he couldn’t quickly find her, or no means to provide for her children if she did.

    http://www.thehotline.org/2013/06/50-obstacles-to-leaving-1-10/

    We need to stop blaming women for not being able to make abusive men “behave”, and start offering THEM the practical and emotional support needed to leave! Or here’s a thought– if CPS knows a man is dangerous, how come THEY can’t call the police and get him incarcerated for a fitting length of time? How come we ask untrained civilians to handle violent criminals by themselves?

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.